Prosecutorial Oversight: New York City event - Hour Two


And you wonder why things just don't change. How can we expect lawyers, prosecutors and judges to expose one of their own? It's no different than the "blue wall of silence" in law enforcement. Everyone has each others back! They know better than anyone that accountability will kill their ability to operate and control the system. A defendant stands alone against a system that is designed and allowed to protect itself and that is immune from all accountability. How can anyone be assured fair treatment when, as John Thompson puts it, "you just water down the misconduct and makes it a harmless mistake"! Sure they are sad that Thompson lost many good years of his life and how it nearly cost him his life, but you know, the judge has a case load of 2oo cases and it's really not possible to read all the discovery and that perhaps prosecutors need more training on how to ensure that they don't impede upon someones' constitutional rights and their presumption of innocence! Bull Shit! What training is required to recognize the difference between the truth and a lie? These people are only concerned with their careers, their political power and positions and the profits that let them to continue to live their so-called honorable and respected lives above everyone else.

If you haven't picked it up from their own words, then you are still missing the message here!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Politically Above the Law

America is doomed if you accept this conclusion from the FBI’s investigation of Hillary Clinton. What you should accept is the evidentiary findings from this investigation, because the evidence that was found and presented does not support the conclusion. The FBI’s notion of “intent” and the actions of a “reasonable person” in her position are clearly supported by the evidence found. In other words, why would anyone in a governmental position such as Secretary of State, ever use any form of unsecured communication regarding ANY sensitive information regardless of its classification? The fact is she used not just one, but several personal servers to communicate and store any governmental information, when policy and security prohibits such communications. The willful act to ignore these policies only raises question of the underlying intent of doing so. Such actions are “grossly negligent” because the risk of harm, intrusion and security is extensive op...
Read more

June is False Allegations Awareness Month

Here is a letter written to the editor of one of the Cambridge, OH newspapers. It is well written and speaks for itself without any additional commentary from me. I now share this with you and hope that you read it as intently as it was written! Thank you Janice for your contribution and perspective on this important subject! FALSE ALLEGATIONS – CRIMES UNPUNISHED “An injustice to One Man, Woman, or Child Threatens Justice to All People Equally”, Dean Tong. Our legal system can no longer guarantee equal protection under the law and a person is innocent until proven guilty is now far from inviolate.   How did we come to such sad commentary? America’s legal system has become awash in false allegations of abuse including accusations of domestic violence, child abuse and sexual assaults.   False allegations are harmful because they:   1. Take away scarce protections and services from real victims.   2. Can be devastating to the falsely accused.   3. Fo...
Read more

The Science of Bias

--> I have been following Dr. Dror since the airing of “ The Real CSI ” on Frontline back in April 2012. Since then he has published many additional articles relating to the subject of Cognitive Bias and how it plays in the handling of forensic evidence and those that are “experts” in those fields. In a recent article in the Irish Times, “ Why forensic evidence may not be as certain as we’d like to think it is ”, Dr. Dror writes more about how bias can play a role in the field of forensic testing and analysis and how it can affect expert testimony in the courts. It certainly does raise the question to how valid or accurate expert analysis and testimony truly is. A concern that I have had and have corresponded with Dr. Dror about, is the natural bias or prejudice that exists with us all, especially when we are called to serve as jurors, the evaluators’ of the facts and evidence during criminal trials. It is my belief that a person’s natural prejudice, based upon thei...
Read more